Head to head
secobserve-mcp vs FlowSentry
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.
Full listingFlowSentry
Cio.github.vasilicasijarvis/flowsentryNo reviews yet
Security scanner for n8n workflows + live MCP Trust-Check. 18 rules, OWASP mapped. Paid x402 API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours secobserve-mcp (83/100 against 67). FlowSentry is hosted and callable through the gateway; secobserve-mcp runs on your own machine. secobserve-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| secobserve-mcp | FlowSentry | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 381 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |