Head to head
SMTP vs Shaka
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server that sends mail over SMTP, gated behind an allowlist and a human confirmation
Full listingNo reviews yet
Company email for Rwanda. Read and send mail from a Shaka mailbox over OAuth or an API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SMTP (83/100 against 70). Shaka is hosted and callable through the gateway; SMTP runs on your own machine. SMTP has noticeably more public adoption.
| SMTP | Shaka | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 44 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category |