Head to head
Pulsefeed X402 vs three.ws Agent Payments
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pulsefeed X402
Aio.github.Nikolife2016/pulsefeed-x402No reviews yet
Verify x402 payment endpoints before an AI agent pays: scam scan, on-chain checks, trust scores.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Governed x402 payment sessions: pay any endpoint with budget, allowlist & per-tx caps, no key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pulsefeed X402 (93/100 against 83). Pulsefeed X402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Agent Payments runs on your own machine. three.ws Agent Payments has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pulsefeed X402 | three.ws Agent Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 48 | 40 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 11 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |