Mmcp.market

Head to head

three.ws Audio vs NotebookLM MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

three.ws Audioio.github.nirholas/audio-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Text-to-speech, speech-to-text, audio-to-face lipsync, and motion-capture clips for 3D agents.

Full listing
NotebookLM MCPio.github.roomi-fields/notebooklm-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Automate Google NotebookLM — Q&A with citations, audio, video, content generation

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Audio (83/100 against 63).

 three.ws AudioNotebookLM MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C63/100
AdoptionEstablishedEstablished
GitHub stars206179
Downloads / week38672
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—42
Write actions—8
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-04
CategoryMediaMedia

Other comparisons

three.ws Audio vs Fishthree.ws Audio vs Vidofythree.ws Audio vs Justtranscribethree.ws Audio vs Ollosthree.ws Audio vs RendobarAll Media servers