Mmcp.market

Head to head

three.ws Billing vs Protect

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

three.ws Billingio.github.nirholas/billing-mcp
B
No reviews yet

An agent's account economics — plan quotas, metered usage, invoices, receipts, and earnings.

Full listing
Protectcom.scopeblind/protect-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Billing (83/100 against 65).

 three.ws BillingProtect
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C65/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2069
Downloads / week341.6k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—12
Write actions—5
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

three.ws Billing vs Auscathree.ws Billing vs Agent-Native Planthree.ws Billing vs Actual Budget MCP Serverthree.ws Billing vs Emilia Protocolthree.ws Billing vs RunapiAll AI and agents servers