Head to head
three.ws Signals vs spendtron
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Discover signal feeds ranked by proven edge, rank publishers, and subscribe + track results.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Rank your GitHub org's Actions workflows by real compute cost. Read-only audit via GitHub App.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 88 out of 100). spendtron is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Signals runs on your own machine. three.ws Signals has noticeably more public adoption.
| three.ws Signals | spendtron | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 206 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 41 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |