Head to head
Browser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) vs SeleniumBase MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (86/100 against 60). Browser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) is hosted and callable through the gateway; SeleniumBase MCP runs on your own machine. SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Browser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) | SeleniumBase MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 13k |
| Downloads / week | – | 314k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |
Other comparisons
Browser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) vs AIHawkBrowser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) vs Ui.Vision MCPBrowser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) vs walkerOS Source BrowserBrowser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) vs SafariBrowser Automation Agent by Nova (CIVAI) vs ScrapelessAll Scraping and browsing servers