Head to head
Snowflake MCP Server vs Snowflake timestamp bits, id discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
A Snowflake MCP server — SQL queries, schema exploration, and data insights for AI assistants
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Snowflake timestamp bits, id discarded (91/100 against 83). Snowflake timestamp bits, id discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Snowflake MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| Snowflake MCP Server | Snowflake timestamp bits, id discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 55 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | 30 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |