Head to head
Rhizome MCP vs Ticktick
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP server for task tracking and coordination of autonomous AI coding agents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for TickTick task management: field-preserving updates and completion tracking.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Rhizome MCP (92/100 against 73). Rhizome MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Rhizome MCP | Ticktick | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 229 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |