Head to head
SecHelix vs Sec 13f
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Evidence-first security review of authorized repositories. Read-only, root-confined, no shell.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SecHelix (92/100 against 77). Sec 13f is hosted and callable through the gateway; SecHelix runs on your own machine.
| SecHelix | Sec 13f | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 58 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 42 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |