Head to head
Open Agreements vs Tidewave Rails
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fill standard legal agreement templates (NDAs, SAFEs, NVCA docs, employment) as DOCX files.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Runtime-level MCP server for Rails development: run code, read logs, query the DB, read docs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Open Agreements (92/100 against 73). Open Agreements is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tidewave Rails runs on your own machine.
| Open Agreements | Tidewave Rails | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 56 | 474 |
| Downloads / week | 75 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |