Head to head
Openbrowser AI vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI browser automation. Write async Python to navigate, click, type, and extract data.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Render 47 chart types and tiled dashboards as PNG/SVG. Deterministic, no headless browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 80). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Openbrowser AI runs on your own machine. Openbrowser AI has noticeably more public adoption.
| Openbrowser AI | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 244 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 266 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |