Head to head
OpenQR vs Protobuf wire-type scan, body discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 91 out of 100). OpenQR has noticeably more public adoption.
| OpenQR | Protobuf wire-type scan, body discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 7 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 45 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 20 | 30 |
| Write actions | 10 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |