Head to head
OpenQR vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Client editing for sites you built: register, scan, publish, go live, invite the client.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenQR (86/100 against 58). OpenQR is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. OpenQR has noticeably more public adoption.
| OpenQR | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 7 | – |
| Downloads / week | 45 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 20 | 18 |
| Write actions | 10 | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | UNLICENSED |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |