Head to head
scrapewright vs Fitter
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
scrapewright
Aio.github.Ozymandias-Owens-2/scrapewrightNo reviews yet
Give it a URL, get structured rows. A model writes the parser once; replays are free.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Turn any website or API into structured JSON with LLM-authored declarative scraping configs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 88 out of 100). scrapewright is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fitter runs on your own machine. Fitter has noticeably more public adoption.
| scrapewright | Fitter | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 133 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-08-29 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |