Head to head
Palisade vs Hunter MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Monitor and manage email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, BIMI) for your domains.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hunter.io MCP: domain search, email finder and verifier, enrichment, discovery, leads. 11 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Palisade (98/100 against 80). Palisade is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hunter MCP runs on your own machine.
| Palisade | Hunter MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 52 | 41 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category |