Head to head
FireKey MCP vs SeleniumBase MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage FireKey browser profiles and browser lifecycles through an authenticated localhost API.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (86/100 against 55). SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| FireKey MCP | SeleniumBase MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 13k |
| Downloads / week | 37 | 314k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |