Head to head
Jarvis vs Paperless MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first SCIP code navigation and Zoekt search over your own indexed repositories
Full listing
No reviews yet
Paperless-NGX over MCP: search, read, upload and tag documents; manage correspondents and types.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Jarvis (92/100 against 83).
| Jarvis | Paperless MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 770 | 334 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |