Head to head
Jarvis vs Worklittle Jobs
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first SCIP code navigation and Zoekt search over your own indexed repositories
Full listing
No reviews yet
Swipe to apply for jobs and search over 4 million roles with visa, distance, and salary filters.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Jarvis (92/100 against 55). Worklittle Jobs is hosted and callable through the gateway; Jarvis runs on your own machine. Jarvis has noticeably more public adoption.
| Jarvis | Worklittle Jobs | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 4 | – |
| Downloads / week | 770 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 14 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |