Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agify vs Filamental

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agifyio.github.pipeworx-io/agify
B
No reviews yet

Agify MCP — age prediction from first name (agify.io, free, no auth)

Full listing
Filamentalio.github.Scottnine/filamental
A
No reviews yet

Read/write access to your Filamental knowledge graph vault. 17 tools. Local-first, no auth.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Filamental (85/100 against 77). Agify is hosted and callable through the gateway; Filamental runs on your own machine.

 AgifyFilamental
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars02
Downloads / week–53
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools3817
Write actions35
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-242026-09-16
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Agify vs WOCLUB Cube PlaygroundAgify vs Reversecore MCPAgify vs CodeInspectusAgify vs MCPProxyAgify vs spintax.net MCP serverAll Security servers