Mmcp.market

Head to head

Apify vs PyreCrawl

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Apifyio.github.pipeworx-io/apify
B
No reviews yet

Apify MCP — run web-scraping Actors and fetch their dataset results.

Full listing
PyreCrawlio.github.SanggonBoy/PyreCrawl
A
No reviews yet

Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PyreCrawl (92/100 against 77). Apify is hosted and callable through the gateway; PyreCrawl runs on your own machine. PyreCrawl has noticeably more public adoption.

 ApifyPyreCrawl
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars016
Downloads / week–153
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools3913
Write actions4—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Apify vs SeleniumBase MCPApify vs Web ScrapingApify vs Perch DataApify vs Successfactors JobsApify vs Prediction Markets Data: Kalshi + PolymarketAll Scraping and browsing servers