Mmcp.market

Head to head

Sec Nport vs Cork MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Sec Nportio.github.pipeworx-io/sec-nport
B
No reviews yet

SEC Form N-PORT — fund and ETF holdings, asked security-first.

Full listing
Cork MCPio.github.Servosity/cork-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Every Cork API operation, plus cross-client risk attribution and exploitability-first vuln triage.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (77 and 75 out of 100). Sec Nport is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cork MCP runs on your own machine.

 Sec NportCork MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100B75/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars041
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools39—
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Sec Nport vs Reversecore MCPSec Nport vs MCPProxySec Nport vs Debian Security Advisories — buy per-query in-session (debianwatch)Sec Nport vs npm Registry MCP ServerSec Nport vs VMware NSX SecurityAll Security servers