Mmcp.market

Head to head

Sec Nport vs Firefly Iii

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Sec Nportio.github.pipeworx-io/sec-nport
B
No reviews yet

SEC Form N-PORT — fund and ETF holdings, asked security-first.

Full listing
Firefly Iiiio.github.YakupEmreYerli/mcp-firefly-iii
B
No reviews yet

Security-first, self-hosted MCP server for Firefly III — 152 operations behind 5 scoped tools.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (77 and 83 out of 100). Sec Nport is hosted and callable through the gateway; Firefly Iii runs on your own machine.

 Sec NportFirefly Iii
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars02
Downloads / week–74
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools392
Write actions3—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-12
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Sec Nport vs Reversecore MCPSec Nport vs CodeInspectusSec Nport vs MCPProxySec Nport vs SecHelixSec Nport vs CrowdStrike Falcon MCP ServerAll Security servers