Head to head
Magic Cloud vs Redash
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect Redash to Claude -- query data, manage dashboards, and run SQL with natural language.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Magic Cloud (88/100 against 75). Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.
| Magic Cloud | Redash | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 383 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-01 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |