Head to head
Magic Cloud vs Shrike
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listing
No reviews yet
Governs what AI agents do: tool calls, SQL, commands, files checked against policy before they run.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 91 out of 100). Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.
| Magic Cloud | Shrike | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 71 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 15 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-31 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |