Head to head
Postmcp vs Typefully
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Publish and schedule posts to LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Bluesky and YouTube Shorts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Write, schedule, and publish social media posts on X, LinkedIn, Threads, and more via Typefully
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Postmcp (80/100 against 70). Typefully is hosted and callable through the gateway; Postmcp runs on your own machine. Postmcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Postmcp | Typefully | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 21 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | — |
| Write actions | 9 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | — |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |