Head to head
Pseudolife Memory vs Taste Bank
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for MCP-compatible agents: memory bank, fact cortex, dreams, graph.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Reusable visual design systems for AI coding agents — browse, fetch, and submit styles via MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pseudolife Memory (89/100 against 70).
| Pseudolife Memory | Taste Bank | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 8 |
| Downloads / week | 116 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-01 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |