Head to head
Leafengines vs Met
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Leafengines
Bio.github.QWarranto/leafenginesNo reviews yet
🌱 Agricultural AI: Soil analysis, crop recommendations, weather forecasts. FREE TurboQuant.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Weather forecasts from MET Norway (Yr): geocoding plus hourly forecasts worldwide.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Met (90/100 against 78). Met is hosted and callable through the gateway; Leafengines runs on your own machine.
| Leafengines | Met | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B78/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 72 | 32 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-07-12 | 2026-08-22 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |