Head to head
TripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings vs CRW Web Scraper
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scrape TripAdvisor reviews for hotels, restaurants, attractions, and activities.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CRW Web Scraper (88/100 against 67). TripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRW Web Scraper runs on your own machine. CRW Web Scraper has noticeably more public adoption.
| TripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings | CRW Web Scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 1.1k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |
Other comparisons
TripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings vs NovadaTripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings vs MCPTripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings vs BrightdataTripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings vs Openbrowser AITripAdvisor Reviews Scraper - Extract Ratings vs ZenrowsAll Scraping and browsing servers