Head to head
Rebase vs Supabase URL Shape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Schema, database, document, user and dev-server tools for a Rebase backend project.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase URL Shape (91/100 against 82). Supabase URL Shape is hosted and callable through the gateway; Rebase runs on your own machine. Rebase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Rebase | Supabase URL Shape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 994 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 42 | 30 |
| Write actions | 11 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |