Mmcp.market

Head to head

Projectmem vs MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Projectmemio.github.riponcm/projectmem
A
No reviews yet

Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.

Full listing
MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACTio.github.wmujahid428-web/trust-layer
C
No reviews yet

MUJ428 verifies intent and evidence before consequential AI-agent actions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Projectmem (92/100 against 57). MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT is hosted and callable through the gateway; Projectmem runs on your own machine. Projectmem has noticeably more public adoption.

 ProjectmemMUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C57/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars827–
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools1714
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-15—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Projectmem vs LockstepProjectmem vs ContextStream MCP ServerProjectmem vs Total Agent MemoryProjectmem vs adrkit decision memoryProjectmem vs rag-ratAll AI and agents servers