Mmcp.market

Head to head

Actual Budget MCP Server vs ctxlint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Actual Budget MCP Serverio.github.s-stefanov/actual-mcp
B
No reviews yet

MCP server exposing Actual Budget accounts, transactions, budgets and reporting to LLM assistants.

Full listing
ctxlintio.github.YawLabs/ctxlint
A
No reviews yet

Lint AI agent context files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.) against your actual codebase

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ctxlint (91/100 against 83). Actual Budget MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 Actual Budget MCP Serverctxlint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A91/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars23410
Downloads / week867–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Actual Budget MCP Server vs AuscaActual Budget MCP Server vs TrazumActual Budget MCP Server vs Agent Mandate VerificationAll AI and agents servers