Head to head
Accept-Post media-type count, value discarded vs SSH — policy-gated remote access
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (81 and 83 out of 100). Accept-Post media-type count, value discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.
| Accept-Post media-type count, value discarded | SSH — policy-gated remote access | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B81/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 745 |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 30 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |
Other comparisons
Accept-Post media-type count, value discarded vs Azure MCP ServerAccept-Post media-type count, value discarded vs SemioticAccept-Post media-type count, value discarded vs World MonitorAccept-Post media-type count, value discarded vs NetdataAccept-Post media-type count, value discarded vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers