Mmcp.market

Head to head

Angstroms to nanometers, number discarded vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Angstroms to nanometers, number discardedio.github.sadri-dridi/ang-nm
?
No reviews yet

Angstroms to nanometers, number discarded

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Angstroms to nanometers, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Angstroms to nanometers, number discardedSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety grade?B83/100
Adoption—Established
GitHub stars–745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Angstroms to nanometers, number discarded vs Azure MCP ServerAngstroms to nanometers, number discarded vs SemioticAngstroms to nanometers, number discarded vs World MonitorAngstroms to nanometers, number discarded vs NetdataAngstroms to nanometers, number discarded vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers