Head to head
Ansible hosts group count, body discarded vs SSH — policy-gated remote access
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (81 and 83 out of 100). Ansible hosts group count, body discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ansible hosts group count, body discarded | SSH — policy-gated remote access | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B81/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 745 |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 30 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |
Other comparisons
Ansible hosts group count, body discarded vs Azure MCP ServerAnsible hosts group count, body discarded vs SemioticAnsible hosts group count, body discarded vs World MonitorAnsible hosts group count, body discarded vs NetdataAnsible hosts group count, body discarded vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers