Mmcp.market

Head to head

BTU to kilojoules, number discarded vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

BTU to kilojoules, number discardedio.github.sadri-dridi/btu-kj
?
No reviews yet

BTU to kilojoules, number discarded

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. BTU to kilojoules, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 BTU to kilojoules, number discardedSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety grade?B83/100
Adoption—Established
GitHub stars–745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

BTU to kilojoules, number discarded vs Azure MCP ServerBTU to kilojoules, number discarded vs SemioticBTU to kilojoules, number discarded vs World MonitorBTU to kilojoules, number discarded vs NetdataBTU to kilojoules, number discarded vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers