Head to head
JSON Schema keyword count, body discarded vs SEO Data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SEO data for AI agents: Google SERP, keyword research, backlinks, site audits, AI answer visibility.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 98 out of 100).
| JSON Schema keyword count, body discarded | SEO Data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 30 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |
Other comparisons
JSON Schema keyword count, body discarded vs HasData TikTokJSON Schema keyword count, body discarded vs NewsBlog ComposerJSON Schema keyword count, body discarded vs Connskill GrowthJSON Schema keyword count, body discarded vs BrandizeJSON Schema keyword count, body discarded vs Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCPAll SEO servers