Head to head
Snowflake worker-id bits, id discarded vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 81). Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Snowflake worker-id bits, id discarded | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B81/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 30 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |