Mmcp.market

Head to head

SQL single-quote escape count, input discarded vs Lific

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SQL single-quote escape count, input discardedio.github.sadri-dridi/sql-esc
A
No reviews yet

SQL single-quote escape count, input discarded

Full listing
Lificio.github.VoidNullable/lific
A
No reviews yet

Local-first, lightweight issue tracker. Single binary, SQLite-backed, MCP-native.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 85 out of 100). SQL single-quote escape count, input discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; Lific runs on your own machine. Lific has noticeably more public adoption.

 SQL single-quote escape count, input discardedLific
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100A85/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars059
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools30—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—Apache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

SQL single-quote escape count, input discarded vs DBHubSQL single-quote escape count, input discarded vs GeoLensSQL single-quote escape count, input discarded vs LINQ to DBSQL single-quote escape count, input discarded vs Magic CloudSQL single-quote escape count, input discarded vs BioMCP-TSAll Databases servers