Head to head
Fiori vs CiteRank MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Full AI visibility audits: schema, citations, agentic readiness, agent journeys, WordPress deploys.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. CiteRank MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fiori runs on your own machine. Fiori has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fiori | CiteRank MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | ? |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 156 | – |
| Downloads / week | 57k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |