Head to head
Perenna vs Repo Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Repo Memory (92/100 against 83). Perenna has noticeably more public adoption.
| Perenna | Repo Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 75 | 28 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2026-08-26 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |