Mmcp.market

Head to head

Protect vs Tersign Evidence

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Protectcom.scopeblind/protect-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.

Full listing
Tersign Evidenceio.github.tersignhq/evidence
B
No reviews yet

Counter-signed evidence records for agent commerce: receipts, verification, dispute envelopes.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tersign Evidence (82/100 against 65).

 ProtectTersign Evidence
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100B82/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars91
Downloads / week1.6k125
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools129
Write actions52
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-172026-08-30
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Protect vs AuscaProtect vs adrkit decision memoryProtect vs AKShareProtect vs prompt-protectionAll AI and agents servers