Mmcp.market

Head to head

Filamental vs CodeInspectus

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Filamentalio.github.Scottnine/filamental
A
No reviews yet

Read/write access to your Filamental knowledge graph vault. 17 tools. Local-first, no auth.

Full listing
CodeInspectusio.github.Synvoya/codeinspectus
C
No reviews yet

Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Filamental (85/100 against 58). CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.

 FilamentalCodeInspectus
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100C58/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars247
Downloads / week53101
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools177
Write actions5—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-162026-09-07
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Filamental vs WOCLUB Cube PlaygroundFilamental vs Reversecore MCPFilamental vs MCPProxyFilamental vs spintax.net MCP serverFilamental vs Ticket DemoAll Security servers