Head to head
Scrapeless vs CrawlEyes MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web search, browser automation, scraping, crawling and CAPTCHA solving for AI agents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web scraping & search for AI agents: extract, SearXNG search, rerank, robots compliance. No API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Scrapeless (92/100 against 83). Scrapeless is hosted and callable through the gateway; CrawlEyes MCP Server runs on your own machine. Scrapeless has noticeably more public adoption.
| Scrapeless | CrawlEyes MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 169 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 244 | 30 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |