Mmcp.market

Head to head

SeleniumBase MCP vs Nostr Signer

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SeleniumBase MCPio.github.seleniumbase/seleniumbase
A
No reviews yet

Stealthy browser automation, testing, and web-scraping via CDP Mode.

Full listing
Nostr Signercom.frontiercrown.signer/nostr-signer
B
No reviews yet

Approve Nostr signatures with your own browser signer without exposing a private key.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (86/100 against 77). Nostr Signer is hosted and callable through the gateway; SeleniumBase MCP runs on your own machine. SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 SeleniumBase MCPNostr Signer
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100B77/100
AdoptionWidely usedNew
GitHub stars13k0
Downloads / week314k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools2417
Write actions13
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-11
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

SeleniumBase MCP vs ScrapelessSeleniumBase MCP vs Web ScrapingSeleniumBase MCP vs AIHawkSeleniumBase MCP vs Web Browser (kogiQA)SeleniumBase MCP vs MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers