Head to head
SEOmatic vs Site
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SEO agent: GSC, keyword, backlink and AI-visibility insights, plus approval-gated site actions
Full listing
No reviews yet
Trades SEO Agency: the site's own MCP server — compare, enquiry (enquiry = a human handoff, not...
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SEOmatic (87/100 against 56). SEOmatic has noticeably more public adoption.
| SEOmatic | Site | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | C56/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | — |
| Category | SEO | SEO |