Head to head
Afi MCP vs SSH — policy-gated remote access
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
The first CLI for Afi SaaS backup - full public-API coverage plus the fleet-wide coverage
Full listingNo reviews yet
Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.
| Afi MCP | SSH — policy-gated remote access | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | B83/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 745 |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.3k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |