Head to head
Atera MCP vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every Atera RMM + PSA endpoint, plus a local SQLite mirror that answers fleet-health, SLA, and
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; Atera MCP runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Atera MCP | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A100/100 |
| Adoption | — | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |