Head to head
Cork MCP vs Trooth
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every Cork API operation, plus cross-client risk attribution and exploitability-first vuln triage.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Trooth is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cork MCP runs on your own machine. Trooth has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cork MCP | Trooth | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A85/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Security | Security |