Head to head
Datto BCDR MCP vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Sync your whole Datto BCDR fleet into local SQLite and answer the questions the per-appliance
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 75). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; Datto BCDR MCP runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Datto BCDR MCP | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 41 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 80k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |